sujit_help
02-01 01:16 PM
My PERM was filed in Dec, 2006 and was denied on April, 2007. As per my employer's lawyer it was erroneously denied by DOL. The lawer has received the denial letter but no reason was stated. He was keep on follwing up with DOL but no answers. On Aug 2007, lawyer was followed up again directly with the DOL office in Atlanta , with the liaison at the American Immigration Lawyer's Association and also it was sent to the congressional office. Through Senetor we came to know that there was typo in the date field. The lawer is persuing to get the denal letter again with reason so that we can appeal. But we have 10% chance to get the another deial letter. Now lawer is asking for filling a new PERM. In between I lost 8 months and now I'm running out time. My 6th year is expiring on Sept08. Just incase if we din't get denial letter and file the new PERM on Mrach can we get the 7th year extension ? (We will show all the documents etc for previos denail case and there was no reason in denail letter. PLEASE HELP
wallpaper Selena Gomez is getting her
WaitingUnlimited
01-14 12:50 PM
Welcome to Immigration Voice, which is dedicated to employment based immigration in USA.
Use google to get your answer on work permit to canada using below link
Google (http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=immigration+to+canada&aq=f&aqi=g10&oq=&fp=3642d8d83be4f02e)
Or Welcome to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp)
Use google to get your answer on work permit to canada using below link
Google (http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=immigration+to+canada&aq=f&aqi=g10&oq=&fp=3642d8d83be4f02e)
Or Welcome to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp)
h1bjava
03-15 08:30 PM
I am applying for my H1B extension in apr 2009 for the start date of oct 1st 2009. I have been with the same client for the last 3 years. Following are my concerns:
My client doesn't give any reference letters as per their HR policy. But we have all contract docs/purchase orders from the client since oct 2006. The client extends the project only every 6 months and this has been happening since 3 years. But if USCIS asks a letter/contract which covers the entire contract period for which the H1B extension is requested, what are my options? Please let me know.
My client doesn't give any reference letters as per their HR policy. But we have all contract docs/purchase orders from the client since oct 2006. The client extends the project only every 6 months and this has been happening since 3 years. But if USCIS asks a letter/contract which covers the entire contract period for which the H1B extension is requested, what are my options? Please let me know.
2011 2010 +selena+gomez+dating+2011
sent4dc
05-08 02:38 AM
Hi everyone:
Can someone suggest if I'm in a hot water over this issue. My company applied for the labor certification back in Dec. 2002. In the Labor Certification form they quoted 40 for the "Total hours per week". The LC was approved back in July of 2007. Later in Sept. of 2007 we filed I-140 and I-485 concurrently.
In April of this year my company received an RFE for the I-140, where USCIS requested some additional translations and my W-2 forms for all the years of my employment. We've responded to it.
So here's my question. Since 2002 my working schedule changed and now I work 32 hours per week, that is different than 40, which was included in the LC. It doesn't say anywhere in my W-2's, but one can easily see that I'm being paid less by doing some simple math.
Do you think this would pose a problem and if so, what shall I do at this point?
Thank you in advance!
Can someone suggest if I'm in a hot water over this issue. My company applied for the labor certification back in Dec. 2002. In the Labor Certification form they quoted 40 for the "Total hours per week". The LC was approved back in July of 2007. Later in Sept. of 2007 we filed I-140 and I-485 concurrently.
In April of this year my company received an RFE for the I-140, where USCIS requested some additional translations and my W-2 forms for all the years of my employment. We've responded to it.
So here's my question. Since 2002 my working schedule changed and now I work 32 hours per week, that is different than 40, which was included in the LC. It doesn't say anywhere in my W-2's, but one can easily see that I'm being paid less by doing some simple math.
Do you think this would pose a problem and if so, what shall I do at this point?
Thank you in advance!
more...
ivdude
04-07 03:30 PM
When my parents went for visa interview, I had only H1B extension reciept.No problem..
jayaj
08-07 09:04 AM
If I get an emergency visa(B2 to assist my unwell sister in US), and later I cancel my plan to visit US, will it have any adverse implications?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
more...
Blog Feeds
04-23 11:32 AM
As of April 6, 2009, all applicants for non-immigrant visas at the U.S. consulate in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, must now enroll at the Applicant Service Center (ASC) fingerprint appointment before attending the interview appointment. ASC employees take applicants’ pictures and fingerprints and provide that data to the consulate. Non-immigrant visas are issued to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis. More information is available at:
www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html (http://www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/o39aUeP8HSg/)
www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html (http://www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/o39aUeP8HSg/)
2010 Do you think Justin Bieber and
Macaca
07-28 04:46 PM
Reid Eyes Rules Changes To Restrict Amendments (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_10/news/19488-1.html) By Emily Pierce, ROLL CALL STAFF, July 23, 2007
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
more...
cygent
06-24 09:04 PM
Could someone please answer my queries please?
hair hairstyles Selena Gomez
vsc
01-23 02:19 PM
Hi
presently i am working on h1b for a tech company. I also have my ead (obtained as a result of july 07 fiasco).
Can i start a company, incorporate a llc or a class c company on my ead? What would be my options?
i know that if i had solely my h1b, i could start a class c company but not work for it(use a gc or a citizen) to do it
my question is that can i still continue on my status quo--ie use h1 for my employer and use ead to start a company, or i have to give up my h1 status? since my wife is on h4, i have to continue on h1b until she gets her ead.
thanks!
presently i am working on h1b for a tech company. I also have my ead (obtained as a result of july 07 fiasco).
Can i start a company, incorporate a llc or a class c company on my ead? What would be my options?
i know that if i had solely my h1b, i could start a class c company but not work for it(use a gc or a citizen) to do it
my question is that can i still continue on my status quo--ie use h1 for my employer and use ead to start a company, or i have to give up my h1 status? since my wife is on h4, i have to continue on h1b until she gets her ead.
thanks!
more...
EndlessWait
10-18 11:26 AM
it could be they found out ? i hope u sent ur pictures ..so it cant be that
hot +selena+gomez+dating+2011
waytotop
07-31 11:58 AM
Even i have the same situation, i got my AP approved and mailed, but my wife's still pending, even my recieved date was 13th june.
Let me know if you get it....
Let me know if you get it....
more...
house selena gomez and justin bieber
aadimanav
08-19 04:54 PM
Hi Everyone,
Just curous - if anyone has experience of filling W8-BEN form. Our bank has sent a letter addressed to my wife requiring her to fill that form.
Does anyone know we have to fill this form?
Aren't we "RESIDENT" fom IRS point of view.
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
THanks,
Just curous - if anyone has experience of filling W8-BEN form. Our bank has sent a letter addressed to my wife requiring her to fill that form.
Does anyone know we have to fill this form?
Aren't we "RESIDENT" fom IRS point of view.
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
THanks,
tattoo dresses are selena gomez and
Blog Feeds
05-17 01:40 PM
Vivek Wadhwa always has interesting things to say about skilled immigrants. Here is a snippet from his recent Business Week commentary: I have a suggestion for Grassley and Durbin. Pass a bill to deregulate the H-1B visa program, and eliminate the restrictions that make it difficult for H-1B holders to travel, switch jobs, or get promoted. Create a fast-track status to U.S. citizenship for H-1B holders providing they launch a company that employs more than 10 American workers within three years. And grant residency to the nearly 1 million H-1B holders and their families waiting in limbo to obtain permanent...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/wadhwa-free-h1b-workers.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/wadhwa-free-h1b-workers.html)
more...
pictures Justin Bieber And Selena Gomez
chi_shark
06-11 02:24 AM
ladies and gents,
has there ever been any regulation issued by the USCIS for the AC21 law? i know about the yates memo in 2005. however, even that memo says that there will be a regulation coming in... so was that ever published? i just want to find out once and FOR ALL whether uscis will allow me to do self-employment in a same or similar job and how prepared should i be for zealous immigration officers sending me way-too-detailed RFEs for stuff related to self employment... i contacted a few lawyers, the only one who was encouraging enough for my taste said that she/he will charge me my arm, leg and possibly an eye or ear... so whats out there already?
has there ever been any regulation issued by the USCIS for the AC21 law? i know about the yates memo in 2005. however, even that memo says that there will be a regulation coming in... so was that ever published? i just want to find out once and FOR ALL whether uscis will allow me to do self-employment in a same or similar job and how prepared should i be for zealous immigration officers sending me way-too-detailed RFEs for stuff related to self employment... i contacted a few lawyers, the only one who was encouraging enough for my taste said that she/he will charge me my arm, leg and possibly an eye or ear... so whats out there already?
dresses justin bieber and selena gomez
Mark101
05-03 07:56 AM
Hi,
My situation -
I am a homemaker on H4 since 2007. ( My husband on H1 ).
Doing MS on H4 ( with few credits still to go )( not full time ).
H4 is due stamping ( Already extended till 2012 ).
Objective -
- To be on F1, to utilize CPT / OPT.
QUESTIONS -
QUESTION - - Which one is better H4 to F1 in US via change of status - I-539 ( BUT That
way i had to face the consulate again for F1 stamping ( Also, very few
credits are left with my MS as in now ))
OR
Directly F1 Visa stamping at
US consulate in India ( It'll be surely fast, that way i won't have to go back for stamping with very few credits left ) ?
My situation -
I am a homemaker on H4 since 2007. ( My husband on H1 ).
Doing MS on H4 ( with few credits still to go )( not full time ).
H4 is due stamping ( Already extended till 2012 ).
Objective -
- To be on F1, to utilize CPT / OPT.
QUESTIONS -
QUESTION - - Which one is better H4 to F1 in US via change of status - I-539 ( BUT That
way i had to face the consulate again for F1 stamping ( Also, very few
credits are left with my MS as in now ))
OR
Directly F1 Visa stamping at
US consulate in India ( It'll be surely fast, that way i won't have to go back for stamping with very few credits left ) ?
more...
makeup 2011 Bieber Dating Selena
Globetrotter
04-01 05:04 PM
I have been reading a lot of late about troubles/Denials given to H1B visa holders at POE.
I have been in US for few years now on H1 working as Marketing Manager and traveled smoothly so far. Planning for a short vacation to Europe. Should I?
Any inputs will be appreciated.
Thank you.
I have been in US for few years now on H1 working as Marketing Manager and traveled smoothly so far. Planning for a short vacation to Europe. Should I?
Any inputs will be appreciated.
Thank you.
girlfriend selena gomez and justin bieber
amaran18
08-23 02:07 PM
HI,
How long did it take for the Senator's office to get a response from USCIS after the request to expedite ?
Thanks.
How long did it take for the Senator's office to get a response from USCIS after the request to expedite ?
Thanks.
hairstyles selena gomez and justin bieber
vinzak
04-27 05:32 PM
Instead of building a border fence to help stem illegal immigration, the U.S. government should implant microchips into immigrants before deportation, much like what is done with pets, Pat Bertroche, an Urbandale physician and one of seven Republicans running in the 3rd District Congressional primary, said Monday.
Install microchips in illegal immigrants, GOP candidate says � Iowa Independent (http://iowaindependent.com/32926/install-microchips-in-illegal-immigrants-gop-candidate-says)
Install microchips in illegal immigrants, GOP candidate says � Iowa Independent (http://iowaindependent.com/32926/install-microchips-in-illegal-immigrants-gop-candidate-says)
azharuddinm
07-17 10:39 AM
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
850 "S" Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
850 "S" Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
prstudio
10-13 06:46 PM
bro put a watermark on that template yo :)
I have a medical template that I never used. I figured someone here may have use for it.
http://www.digitalosophy.com/templates/medical/01.jpg
template price's
PSD Only:
$60
Dreamweaver Files + PSD
$125
Unique price:
All files $600
digitalosophy@gmail.com
I have a medical template that I never used. I figured someone here may have use for it.
http://www.digitalosophy.com/templates/medical/01.jpg
template price's
PSD Only:
$60
Dreamweaver Files + PSD
$125
Unique price:
All files $600
digitalosophy@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment