mbawa2574
07-19 04:53 PM
Immigrants don't pose any security threat as described by you. Below is a link for Citizens to watch who stole the Nuke secrets. Alleged Contractor is probably a Native born American citizen.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/19/tenn.nuclear.arrest/index.html
So moral of story is don't accuse immigrants for everything.:D
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/07/19/tenn.nuclear.arrest/index.html
So moral of story is don't accuse immigrants for everything.:D
wallpaper hair tribal tattoos for men on
masterdude
03-11 08:55 PM
Guys,
My company in-house lawyer says that i don't have to file for H1-b right now because I was approved for H1-b before. I only use 3 month of H1-b time and changed the status to F1. Now, the lawyer advise me that we should use all of my OPT time and file for COS for previous H1-B in June starting date of January 2009, when my OPT expires.
My question is
1) Do you think it is a good ideas or just apply April 1st 2008?
2) Does anybody else have/had a similar situation, do you guys mind sharing what you did?
I will really appreciate all you guys.
Kudos to all the experts...
My company in-house lawyer says that i don't have to file for H1-b right now because I was approved for H1-b before. I only use 3 month of H1-b time and changed the status to F1. Now, the lawyer advise me that we should use all of my OPT time and file for COS for previous H1-B in June starting date of January 2009, when my OPT expires.
My question is
1) Do you think it is a good ideas or just apply April 1st 2008?
2) Does anybody else have/had a similar situation, do you guys mind sharing what you did?
I will really appreciate all you guys.
Kudos to all the experts...
sertasheep
10-29 08:11 PM
Are now available online at immigrationvoice.blogspot.com
2011 upper-ack-tribal-tattoos-for-
Blog Feeds
06-11 06:40 AM
With USCIS filing fees spewing higher than the BP oil spill, you'd think the President and Congress would be holding press conferences to propose a legislative fix. But, alas, immigrants cannot vote, so who cares? Perhaps their U.S. citizen spouses, parents, sons and daughters, siblings and employers who have sponsored them for green cards and temporary working visas. Also, the Immigration Examiners who may lose their jobs as ever-higher filing fees deter immigrants from applying for naturalization and other immigration benefits. Back when I worked as an INS Citizenship Attorney, the cost of applying for U.S. citizenship was a mere...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/06/uscis-fee-increases-dollars-and-sense.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/06/uscis-fee-increases-dollars-and-sense.html)
more...
blazes
08-04 10:50 AM
I like it. Mabey put a small lime on it somewhere though? That'd be cool.
Michael chertoff
05-08 04:04 PM
Friends,
I am starting this thread for the people who are Greencard Holders and not married. Please share some thoughts for bringing their spouse here.
IV can help in this matter.
If all visa holders and citizens can bring their spouse instantly then why GC holder have to wait for many years after getting GC after many years.
Thanks
Jet
are you a donor?
MC
I am starting this thread for the people who are Greencard Holders and not married. Please share some thoughts for bringing their spouse here.
IV can help in this matter.
If all visa holders and citizens can bring their spouse instantly then why GC holder have to wait for many years after getting GC after many years.
Thanks
Jet
are you a donor?
MC
more...
netfood
07-13 07:36 PM
I had L1A from 10/2005 to 10/2008. My lawyer filed I-485 in 2008, but he did not file extension of L1A. My L1A is expired in 2008. In Jan. 2010, my I-485 was denied. We filed appeal in Feb.. Then, we filed L1A extension, which is denied in June 2010. I do not know what to do? I have been in here for five years. now my wife and child's L2 also expired. Can I file another L1A without leaving USA (I was told no, because I did not meet 1/3 requirement, one year abroad within three years of admission into the USA. I have to go back Jamaca for one year and refile there, but I would give up my I-485). Thanks.
2010 Men Tribal Tattoo Design For
Macaca
09-27 05:46 PM
Bill Would Protect Frosh on Immigration (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_30/news/20086-1.html) By Jennifer Yachnin | ROLL CALL STAFF, September 20, 2007
House Democratic leaders are drafting a resolution designed to inoculate freshman lawmakers on the issue of immigration, despite concerns from within their own Caucus about reopening debate over the contentious topic.
According to several freshman Democratic lawmakers in attendance at a weekly breakfast meeting with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), Members were told to prepare statements on the resolution, which will endorse laws already on the books that prevent illegal immigrants from participating in taxpayer-funded programs, such as Social Security or food stamps.
In a draft of the resolution obtained by Roll Call, the measure expresses the sense of the House "with respect to the importance of upholding federal immigration laws and ensuring the integrity and security of the borders of the United States."
In addition to the language on public benefits, the draft resolution also contains provisions calling on the executive branch to enforce laws on voter fraud and border security.
But one House lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said some senior Members have objected to the proposal over concerns that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to limit the scope of the debate. The House largely abandoned plans to pursue a comprehensive immigration reform bill earlier this year after the Senate failed to cut off debate on its own version of the legislation, effectively killing the bill.
Majority Whip James Clyburn (S.C.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.) began work on the resolution earlier this month in response to repeated Republican efforts to force votes on immigration on the House floor through the use of procedural amendments.
"We're trying to figure out a way we can do this and maintain party unity on the motions ... without making it a crisis," said one Democratic lawmaker, who is a member of the Whip operation.
Although one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified since plans have not been finalized, said the measure could move to the floor as early as next week, a House leadership aide said it is unlikely to be that soon.
To date, Democratic leaders have not demanded that Members vote against all motions to recommit - a procedural tool that can be used by the minority party immediately before a vote on final passage of a bill - unless the amendment contains language that would shelve the legislation.
"I've resisted motions to recommit unless they're substantive and then I'll vote for them," explained Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.), a freshman lawmaker who has faced attacks from the National Republican Congressional Committee for votes against some GOP-authored amendments on immigration.
"It's frustrating to me," Walz added, criticizing the amendments as political footballs. "I'm appreciative that our leadership lets us vote accordingly."
But that policy led to some confusion on the House floor in early August during a vote on a GOP-authored amendment to the Agriculture spending bill to prohibit illegal immigrants from accessing certain federally funded programs, with nearly 20 Democrats initially voting in favor of the proposal.
Republicans allege that the Democratic majority mishandled that vote, resulting in the defeat of the measure. GOP leaders assert that a tied 214-214 vote - rending a defeat - announced by the Speaker Pro Tem was inaccurate and that the motion had in fact passed 215-213 as Republicans changed their votes.
But Democrats dispute that version of events, noting that their own Members were changing votes on the House floor, resulting in the final tally of 212-216.
The dispute prompted the establishment of a select committee to investigate the vote, which is scheduled to hold its first meeting this morning, and produce an interim report Sept. 30.
Republican Rep. Tom Price (Ga.), who has sponsored similar amendments addressing the use of federal funds to assist illegal immigrants, including a measure that failed Tuesday night on a federal housing bill, expressed interest in the Democratic proposal.
"I'd love to be able to talk with them about it and work on it," Price said. He could not say whether such a measure would deter him from offering such amendments in the future without seeing the details of the bill.
"When I talk to folks at home they want to know why we're not including this language on every single piece of legislation," he added.
House Democratic leaders are drafting a resolution designed to inoculate freshman lawmakers on the issue of immigration, despite concerns from within their own Caucus about reopening debate over the contentious topic.
According to several freshman Democratic lawmakers in attendance at a weekly breakfast meeting with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), Members were told to prepare statements on the resolution, which will endorse laws already on the books that prevent illegal immigrants from participating in taxpayer-funded programs, such as Social Security or food stamps.
In a draft of the resolution obtained by Roll Call, the measure expresses the sense of the House "with respect to the importance of upholding federal immigration laws and ensuring the integrity and security of the borders of the United States."
In addition to the language on public benefits, the draft resolution also contains provisions calling on the executive branch to enforce laws on voter fraud and border security.
But one House lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said some senior Members have objected to the proposal over concerns that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to limit the scope of the debate. The House largely abandoned plans to pursue a comprehensive immigration reform bill earlier this year after the Senate failed to cut off debate on its own version of the legislation, effectively killing the bill.
Majority Whip James Clyburn (S.C.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (Md.) began work on the resolution earlier this month in response to repeated Republican efforts to force votes on immigration on the House floor through the use of procedural amendments.
"We're trying to figure out a way we can do this and maintain party unity on the motions ... without making it a crisis," said one Democratic lawmaker, who is a member of the Whip operation.
Although one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified since plans have not been finalized, said the measure could move to the floor as early as next week, a House leadership aide said it is unlikely to be that soon.
To date, Democratic leaders have not demanded that Members vote against all motions to recommit - a procedural tool that can be used by the minority party immediately before a vote on final passage of a bill - unless the amendment contains language that would shelve the legislation.
"I've resisted motions to recommit unless they're substantive and then I'll vote for them," explained Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.), a freshman lawmaker who has faced attacks from the National Republican Congressional Committee for votes against some GOP-authored amendments on immigration.
"It's frustrating to me," Walz added, criticizing the amendments as political footballs. "I'm appreciative that our leadership lets us vote accordingly."
But that policy led to some confusion on the House floor in early August during a vote on a GOP-authored amendment to the Agriculture spending bill to prohibit illegal immigrants from accessing certain federally funded programs, with nearly 20 Democrats initially voting in favor of the proposal.
Republicans allege that the Democratic majority mishandled that vote, resulting in the defeat of the measure. GOP leaders assert that a tied 214-214 vote - rending a defeat - announced by the Speaker Pro Tem was inaccurate and that the motion had in fact passed 215-213 as Republicans changed their votes.
But Democrats dispute that version of events, noting that their own Members were changing votes on the House floor, resulting in the final tally of 212-216.
The dispute prompted the establishment of a select committee to investigate the vote, which is scheduled to hold its first meeting this morning, and produce an interim report Sept. 30.
Republican Rep. Tom Price (Ga.), who has sponsored similar amendments addressing the use of federal funds to assist illegal immigrants, including a measure that failed Tuesday night on a federal housing bill, expressed interest in the Democratic proposal.
"I'd love to be able to talk with them about it and work on it," Price said. He could not say whether such a measure would deter him from offering such amendments in the future without seeing the details of the bill.
"When I talk to folks at home they want to know why we're not including this language on every single piece of legislation," he added.
more...
TheAnimator
08-10 08:23 PM
We are a company that makes flash sites with hardcore 3D effects. We are currently working on our new site but if you need a site and are interested contact me, I can show you some work and we can get started on your site immediately.
Contact details are on my profile.
Contact details are on my profile.
hair girlfriend Tribal Tattoos
kirupa
02-28 01:05 AM
Not any more. There are two other variants of that here: http://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=191350
:)
:)
more...
ok1618
10-20 07:48 PM
Hi,
I have entered in US with a H1B of company A. I got it transferred to company B in Nov 2008 and got it approved .. i have I797 and I94 valid till Dec 2010.
In May 2009 I have initiated H1b transfer with company C and today I came to know that it is denied. I dont know the reasons yet.
Can any one suggest what are my available options.
Can I initiate transfer with another company with the 1797 of the companyB
I have entered in US with a H1B of company A. I got it transferred to company B in Nov 2008 and got it approved .. i have I797 and I94 valid till Dec 2010.
In May 2009 I have initiated H1b transfer with company C and today I came to know that it is denied. I dont know the reasons yet.
Can any one suggest what are my available options.
Can I initiate transfer with another company with the 1797 of the companyB
hot men is ack tribal tattoos
RNGC
06-27 09:24 PM
Folks,
Today (06/27/2008) is Bill Gates last day as Microsoft Chairman. As a good will gesture let us all send him a greeting card wishing him good luck. He has been a champion for our cause and we owe him one.
A hand written personal greeting card will be a good idea (no e-cards please)
A short note regarding our issues will not be a bad idea, also do not forget to put ImmigrationVoice.org in your signature! Thousands of cards with IV signature will also help IVs exposure :)
I request ADMIN to have this thread on top so many IVans can send cards to Mr.Gates.
This is the best contact I got, if someone has a better one, Please post:
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
PO Box 23350
Seattle, WA 98102
Today (06/27/2008) is Bill Gates last day as Microsoft Chairman. As a good will gesture let us all send him a greeting card wishing him good luck. He has been a champion for our cause and we owe him one.
A hand written personal greeting card will be a good idea (no e-cards please)
A short note regarding our issues will not be a bad idea, also do not forget to put ImmigrationVoice.org in your signature! Thousands of cards with IV signature will also help IVs exposure :)
I request ADMIN to have this thread on top so many IVans can send cards to Mr.Gates.
This is the best contact I got, if someone has a better one, Please post:
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
PO Box 23350
Seattle, WA 98102
more...
house upper ack tribal
Waitingnvain
08-14 04:14 PM
Admin:
I missed the 2nd conference call. Could you please post the transcipt of the call.
Thanks
I missed the 2nd conference call. Could you please post the transcipt of the call.
Thanks
tattoo Back Tribal Tattoos For Men
kirupa
12-20 04:08 AM
I think MVVM is good for the type of apps people are building right now. The way I see it, patterns usually evolve as the type of applications they help build evolve. Many applications even today do not strictly follow a view/model separation even today :P
more...
pictures tribal tattoos for men
lifestrikes
02-26 02:49 PM
Copies of the documents will do. Original is not required for H-4 stamping.
dresses Woman have the same tattooing,
sravani
05-02 03:41 PM
You didn't indicate the reason why your friend's H1B got rejected. If the H1 got rejected due to the problems with the company sponsored the H1, then it's highly likely the new H1 will get approved.
more...
makeup ack tattoos for men. tribal
gc_bulgaria
09-28 07:23 PM
I have a certain labor category approved 19-#### and AOS is applied . Now the job I am looking at moving to has the same number (19-####) but the job duties are not exactly same. Will this be OK for AC21 or will I have problems?
girlfriend Cross Tattoos For Men Back.
immique
03-30 12:38 AM
please post your experiences regarding recent RFEs for EB2 and EB3 to EB2 conversions. please include details regarding what the RFE was issued for. I am startng this thread because I am hearing different things from different people saying EB2 is being scrutinized more(especially EB3 to EB2 conversions) and this is resulting in more RFEs. I need every body who received RFEs recently to comment on it so that we can arrive at an accurate assessment. I am expecting that EB2 India/ China will continue advancing in the next few months. this will indirectly benefit EB3 India also as there will be unused visa numbers that will overflow into EB3, but the only problem is if applications are scrutinized, then the RFEs may delay processing for many people with earlier PDs even if their date becomes current.
hairstyles 2011 tribal tattoos for men
FinalGC
03-06 10:25 AM
Guys:
Need your input in a scenario of a friend of mine. My friend's wife is on H1 for the past 4 months and wants to transfer to an H4 visa under her husband. The wife's employer has not paid her any salary nor has he got her any project for the past 4-5 months, hence they are forced to make this decision. The h1 my friend's wife is only H1 approval papers and it is not stamped on her passport. The wife's employer is not willing to give her any papers of release or letter of leave without pay from her employment.
She needs to desperatly change her status to H4.....Suggestions needed??
Question=> Can my friend's wife go to India and apply for a H4 visa directly from the US Consulate in India? Without any papers related to the H1 visa??
Need your input in a scenario of a friend of mine. My friend's wife is on H1 for the past 4 months and wants to transfer to an H4 visa under her husband. The wife's employer has not paid her any salary nor has he got her any project for the past 4-5 months, hence they are forced to make this decision. The h1 my friend's wife is only H1 approval papers and it is not stamped on her passport. The wife's employer is not willing to give her any papers of release or letter of leave without pay from her employment.
She needs to desperatly change her status to H4.....Suggestions needed??
Question=> Can my friend's wife go to India and apply for a H4 visa directly from the US Consulate in India? Without any papers related to the H1 visa??
thamarai
09-25 06:52 PM
I am in L2 visa right now and I have an EAD to work. I got a job that I need to start on oct 01.
My spouse status will change from L1 to H1B from oct 01, as his employer filled for H1B.
Our L1 & L2 are valid until Aug 2011.
I don't have H4 yet.
What are the various options available for me to work?
1. Can I use my EAD to work which is valid until aug 2011?
2. Can I apply for H1B for me? If yes when I can start working with my H1B.
3. Is there is any way to maintain my husband L1 status until it's validity(Aug 2011) and then switching to H1B after L1 expires?
My spouse status will change from L1 to H1B from oct 01, as his employer filled for H1B.
Our L1 & L2 are valid until Aug 2011.
I don't have H4 yet.
What are the various options available for me to work?
1. Can I use my EAD to work which is valid until aug 2011?
2. Can I apply for H1B for me? If yes when I can start working with my H1B.
3. Is there is any way to maintain my husband L1 status until it's validity(Aug 2011) and then switching to H1B after L1 expires?
greencardfever
06-14 03:59 PM
I'm in the same situation, could someone please answer atul555's question.
No comments:
Post a Comment